Considerations for Natural Gas Pneumatic Devices

The most recent revisions to Subpart W will require operators to implement changes to greenhouse gas reporting and, potentially, operations. The following summarizes requirements and makes recommendations for treatment of pneumatic devices. 

New Requirement

  • Additional calculation method based on direct measurement of natural gas supplied to the device or pump that vented directly to atmosphere,
  • Additional calculation method based on natural gas emissions from each device or pump that vented directly to atmosphere,
  • Specific calculation methods for vents that are routed to controls,
  • Revised leak factor calculation for intermittent bleed devices, and
  • New Emission Factors for all types of pneumatic devices

Pneumatic Type

Current EF (scf/hr/device)

New EF (scf/hr/device)

X difference

Low Bleed

1.39

6.8

4.89

Intermittent Bleed

13.5

8.8

0.65

High Continuous Bleed

37.3

21

0.56

 

 

Recommendations

  1. Consider retrofitting all feasible natural gas pneumatics to air or route to a control process or device. Several States have implemented specific reduction plans, but the WEC provides incentive to go beyond the standard.
  2. Maintain a record of all pneumatic devices (routed to process/control, converted to air, or venting to atmosphere)
  3. Be wary of sales companies using phrases like “zero bleed” or “no bleed.” Most devices with this phrase are actually low bleed devices. Non-emitting devices and no/zero bleed are not interchangeable phrases.

With the default emission factors, each low bleed device can roughly be equated to 1 ton per year of methane emissions. Attaching the WEC monetary value of 2026, 1 low bleed pneumatic device equals $1,200 of potential methane tax.

What are you looking for?